by Jason Wasserman MD PhD FRCPC
March 25, 2026
Tumour mutational burden — usually abbreviated as TMB — is a measurement of how many genetic mutations are present in a tumour. The more mutations a cancer carries, the more it tends to look different from normal cells to the immune system. Because immunotherapy drugs work by helping the immune system find and attack cancer, this measurement has become an important biomarker: cancers with a high TMB are more likely to respond to a class of drugs called immune checkpoint inhibitors than cancers with a low TMB. In 2020, the FDA approved the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab (Keytruda) for any advanced solid tumour with a high TMB that has progressed after prior treatment — the first time a cancer drug was approved purely based on this measurement, regardless of cancer type. Understanding what a TMB result means — and what it does not mean — is an important part of interpreting a molecular pathology report.
Every time a cell divides, it must copy its entire DNA. Errors in this copying process, as well as damage caused by environmental exposures such as ultraviolet light from the sun or carcinogens in tobacco smoke, result in mutations — permanent changes in the DNA sequence. Healthy cells have repair systems that catch and fix most of these errors. In cancer cells, those repair systems are often partially or completely broken, allowing mutations to accumulate over time.
TMB is measured as the number of somatic (acquired, non-inherited) mutations per megabase of DNA — a megabase being one million DNA base pairs. A tumour with a high TMB has accumulated many more mutations than a tumour with a low TMB.
Why does this matter for treatment? When a cancer cell carries many mutations, some of those mutations result in abnormal proteins appearing on the cell’s surface. These abnormal proteins, called neoantigens, are foreign-looking to the immune system. T cells — the immune system’s attacking cells — can, in principle, recognize neoantigens and kill the cells that display them. However, cancers have evolved ways to suppress this immune attack, including by producing molecules that act as “off switches” (immune checkpoints) for T cells. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are drugs that block these off-switches, freeing T cells to do their job. Tumours with high TMB present the immune system with more targets to work with, which is why they tend to respond better to checkpoint inhibition than tumours with few mutations.
It is important to understand that TMB is a continuous measurement — there is a spectrum from very low to very high — and the cutoff that separates “TMB-high” from “TMB-low” is somewhat arbitrary. The FDA-approved cutoff is 10 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb), as measured by validated genomic tests such as the FoundationOne CDx assay. This means a result of 10 mut/Mb or higher qualifies as TMB-high, though response rates are meaningfully higher in tumours with 13 mut/Mb or more.
The biological basis of high TMB varies across cancer types, with important implications for how reliably TMB predicts immunotherapy benefit. Understanding which category your cancer falls into is a useful context for interpreting your result.
Cutaneous melanoma (skin melanoma) consistently has among the highest TMB of any cancer type — typically well above 10 mut/Mb — because it is directly driven by the mutagenic effects of ultraviolet (UV) light from sun exposure. Each time UV radiation damages DNA, and the damage is imperfectly repaired, another mutation accumulates. Over years of sun exposure, this produces a very high mutational load. This biological explanation is directly relevant to treatment: the landmark trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma, including early trials of ipilimumab (Yervoy) and subsequent trials of pembrolizumab and nivolumab (Opdivo), showed dramatic and durable responses in a subset of patients — responses that were among the highest seen with any cancer immunotherapy at the time. These responses laid much of the groundwork for TMB as a concept and for the subsequent pan-cancer approval.
In melanoma, however, it is worth knowing that TMB is not the only relevant factor. PD-L1 expression and tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte levels also predict response, and a subset of patients with lower TMB still respond. Conversely, not all high-TMB melanomas respond. For most patients with advanced melanoma, immunotherapy is offered based on the overall profile of the disease, and TMB is one of several factors oncologists consider. The BRAF mutation status of the melanoma is also critical and is discussed in a separate article.
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a high median TMB, particularly in patients with a significant history of tobacco smoking — again a direct consequence of the mutagenic effect of tobacco carcinogens on lung cell DNA. In NSCLC, TMB has been one of the most extensively studied immunotherapy biomarkers, alongside PD-L1 expression. The two measurements provide partially overlapping but distinct information. Some tumours are high in both, some in one but not the other, and the combination is being studied as a more refined predictor of response.
An important caveat in lung cancer is that driver mutation status — particularly EGFR mutations and ALK fusions — is associated with lower TMB and lower immunotherapy response rates, even when overall TMB is above 10 mut/Mb. For patients whose lung cancers carry targetable driver mutations, targeted therapy (rather than immunotherapy) is typically the preferred initial treatment, and TMB plays a less central role in those decisions.
Bladder and other urothelial cancers have among the highest rates of TMB-high tumours of any common solid cancer — approximately 38% of urothelial cancers have TMB above 10 mut/Mb. This is partly attributable to APOBEC mutagenesis (an internal DNA-editing process that can go awry in cancer cells) and to other mutagenic processes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are well-established in urothelial cancer, particularly for patients who cannot receive or have progressed on cisplatin-based chemotherapy. TMB is one of several biomarkers used alongside PD-L1 expression to guide immunotherapy decisions in this cancer type.
Endometrial cancer has among the highest rates of TMB-high tumours across all cancer types — approximately 40 to 43% of endometrial cancers have high TMB overall. Within this group, two distinct biological drivers of high TMB are important to understand.
The first is MMR deficiency (dMMR/MSI-H), which is common in endometrial cancer (present in approximately 25 to 30% of cases). MMR deficiency leads to the accumulation of thousands of mutations because the DNA error-correction system is not functioning. These tumours tend to have high TMB and respond well to immunotherapy.
The second, and even more extreme, driver is mutations in the POLE (DNA polymerase epsilon) gene. POLE encodes a protein that is part of the DNA copying machinery. When POLE carries a specific type of inactivating mutation in its “proofreading” domain, the copying machinery becomes extraordinarily error-prone — producing some of the highest TMB values observed in any human cancer, sometimes exceeding 100 or even several hundred mut/Mb. POLE-mutated endometrial cancers represent a distinct molecular subtype with strikingly high immunotherapy response rates. Interestingly, POLE mutations are associated with a paradoxically good prognosis in endometrial cancer despite the tumour appearing high-grade — a feature that pathologists and oncologists are increasingly recognizing as clinically meaningful. POLE testing is now performed as part of the standard molecular classification of endometrial cancer.
In colorectal cancer, TMB distribution is bimodal — most tumours are TMB-low (approximately 85%), while a distinct subgroup is TMB-high. This high-TMB subgroup largely overlaps with, but is not identical to, the dMMR/MSI-H subgroup discussed in the MMR/MSI colorectal cancer article. POLE mutations can also drive ultra-high TMB in a small subset of colorectal cancers. For patients with colorectal cancer and high TMB that is also MSS (microsatellite stable), the relationship between TMB and immunotherapy benefit is less clearly established than in dMMR/MSI-H disease, and TMB alone in MSS colorectal cancer is not currently a reliable standalone predictor of immunotherapy response. The management of colorectal cancer with high TMB is most straightforwardly guided by MMR/MSI status first, with TMB providing additional context.
Several other cancer types have meaningful rates of TMB-high tumours and established or emerging immunotherapy activity worth understanding.
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a high overall TMB driven by tobacco carcinogen exposure, similar to NSCLC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (atezolizumab or durvalumab combined with chemotherapy) are approved as first-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC, in part reflecting this immunogenic background.
Cervical cancer has a meaningful rate of TMB-high tumours and is one of the cancer types included in the KEYNOTE-158 trial data supporting the pan-cancer TMB approval. Pembrolizumab is approved in cervical cancer based on both PD-L1 expression and, for some indications, regardless of PD-L1 status in recurrent or metastatic disease.
Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare but aggressive skin cancer that responds exceptionally well to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Interestingly, it is an example of a tumour that responds to immunotherapy even when TMB is relatively low — demonstrating that TMB alone does not always predict benefit, particularly when the immune response is being driven by viral antigens (Merkel cell polyomavirus) rather than somatic mutations.
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma has a variable TMB that is higher in tobacco-related tumours and in a subset of HPV-negative tumours. Pembrolizumab is approved for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer based primarily on PD-L1 expression; TMB is an additional factor in some settings.
Oesophageal cancer, gastric cancer, and other gastrointestinal tumours have variable but meaningful TMB rates. Immunotherapy is now part of standard treatment for advanced gastric and oesophageal cancers in specific molecular subgroups, though the role of TMB independent of other markers (particularly MMR status and PD-L1) continues to be defined.
TMB testing is most commonly ordered in the context of advanced or metastatic cancer, when standard treatment options have been exhausted or when comprehensive molecular profiling is being performed to identify all potential treatment targets. The test is typically not ordered for early-stage cancers where surgery or other local treatments are the primary approach.
Specific reasons your oncologist may have ordered TMB testing include:
Current guidelines recommend TMB testing for patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumours when comprehensive molecular profiling is being performed — particularly when other biomarkers (such as MMR, KRAS, BRAF, and EGFR) are being tested as part of the standard workup for that cancer type. Since most comprehensive next-generation sequencing panels automatically calculate TMB, many patients who undergo NGS panel testing will receive a TMB result without needing to request it separately.
TMB testing is not routinely recommended as a standalone test in early-stage cancers treated with surgery or local therapy. The value of TMB testing is greatest when treatment decisions — particularly about immunotherapy — are actively being made.
TMB is measured using molecular testing on tumour tissue, most commonly from a biopsy or surgically removed specimen. The most widely used method in clinical practice is targeted next-generation sequencing using a validated gene panel. This test analyses several hundred cancer-relevant genes simultaneously and uses the number and type of mutations detected to estimate the overall mutation rate in the tumour. The FDA-approved companion diagnostic for the pembrolizumab TMB-high approval is the FoundationOne CDx assay, which analyses approximately 1.1 megabases of the tumour genome.
Whole-exome sequencing (WES) — which analyses all protein-coding regions of the genome — gives the most comprehensive TMB measurement, but is more expensive and slower than panel testing and is primarily used in research settings. Panel-based TMB estimates correlate closely with whole-exome TMB and are considered clinically adequate for treatment decisions.
Blood-based TMB assessment, using circulating tumour DNA from a blood sample (liquid biopsy), is an active area of research but is not yet validated for routine clinical use in most settings.
TMB results are typically reported in the molecular testing or genomic profiling section of your pathology report. They will usually appear in one or both of the following formats:
Some reports will include a brief comment explaining the clinical significance of the TMB result—for example, whether it suggests eligibility for pembrolizumab or recommends discussing it with an oncologist. Others will state the score and label without further interpretation.
A TMB-low result indicates the tumour has a relatively low number of somatic mutations and is less likely to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy based solely on TMB. This does not mean immunotherapy is completely ruled out — eligibility for immunotherapy in most cancer types is determined primarily by other biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression and MMR/MSI status, which can indicate immunotherapy benefit even at low TMB. A TMB-low result means that TMB is not adding evidence in favour of immunotherapy for your tumour.
A TMB-high result means the tumour carries an above-threshold number of somatic mutations and may be more likely to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Specifically, it may make your tumour eligible for pembrolizumab under the pan-cancer TMB-high approval if you have progressed after prior treatment and have no other satisfactory treatment options.
Several important caveats about a TMB-high result are worth understanding:
The FDA’s June 2020 accelerated approval of pembrolizumab for TMB-high (≥10 mut/Mb) solid tumours was a significant milestone — the fourth time the FDA approved a cancer drug based on a molecular feature of the tumour rather than where in the body the cancer originated. The approval was based on data from KEYNOTE-158, a large multi-cohort clinical trial that enrolled patients with ten different types of advanced cancer. Among the 102 patients whose tumours were TMB-high, the overall response rate was 29%, and 57% of responders maintained their response for at least 12 months — a signal of durability that is particularly meaningful in advanced cancer.
The approval applies to adult and paediatric patients with any unresectable or metastatic TMB-high solid tumour, as measured by an FDA-approved test, who have progressed after prior treatment and have no other satisfactory options. It is an accelerated approval — meaning it was granted based on response rate as a surrogate marker and may be subject to confirmation in later trials. The requirement that the test be performed using an FDA-approved companion diagnostic (the FoundationOne CDx assay) is clinically important: not all TMB tests use the same methods or cutoffs, and results from different platforms may not be directly interchangeable. If your TMB result was measured on a different platform, your oncologist may consider whether the result is validated for treatment decisions.
TMB is a useful but imperfect tool, and this should be understood before interpreting a result. Several important limitations are worth knowing:
These limitations do not diminish the value of TMB as a biomarker. Still, they do mean that TMB results should always be interpreted in the context of your specific cancer type, other biomarker results, and clinical situation — not in isolation.
If your pathology report includes a TMB result, the next steps depend on where you are in your treatment:
If you are uncertain about what a TMB result means for your specific cancer, asking your oncologist to walk through the result in the context of all your other molecular findings is the most useful approach.