A hereditary cancer syndrome is a condition in which a change in a single gene, inherited from a parent and present from birth, raises a person’s lifetime risk of developing certain cancers. Well-known examples include Lynch syndrome and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, caused by changes in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
The most useful thing to know at the outset is that carrying one of these gene changes is not a diagnosis of cancer, and it is not a prediction that cancer will happen. It is information about risk, and it is information that can be acted on. People who know they carry one of these changes are screened earlier, more often, and more effectively than anyone else, and in some cases cancers can be prevented entirely.
This article is written for anyone approaching this subject for the first time: people considering genetic testing, people who have just received a result, and people whose relative has been diagnosed with a hereditary syndrome. It explains the ideas that apply across all of these conditions. Articles on individual syndromes are linked at the end.
Less than most people expect. Roughly 5% to 10% of all cancers are caused by an inherited gene change. The other 90% or more are not.
This is worth sitting with, because a cancer diagnosis in a family often produces immediate fear that everyone is at risk. Usually they are not. Cancer is common: something close to two in five people will develop cancer at some point. In a large family, several relatives having cancer may simply reflect how common the disease is, particularly if they were diagnosed at older ages and with different types of cancer.
At the same time, 5% to 10% is not a small number, and the people in that group benefit enormously from being identified. The purpose of genetic testing is to find them.
Cancer is usually sorted into three groups, and knowing which one applies changes what happens next.
The boundary between the second and third groups is not fixed. Families once labeled familial are sometimes reclassified as hereditary when a new gene is discovered or a test is repeated with better technology.
Two ideas explain most of what follows.
The first is where the gene change is. A somatic change arises inside a tumor during a person’s life. It exists only in the cancer cells; it cannot be passed to children, and it says nothing about relatives. A germline change is present in the DNA a person was born with, exists in every cell of the body including egg and sperm cells, and can be passed on. Hereditary cancer syndromes are germline conditions.
This distinction causes constant confusion, because modern cancer care tests both. When a tumor is sent for molecular testing, the report may name genes that are also hereditary cancer genes. That does not mean the change is inherited. Confirming that requires a separate test on blood or saliva. If a tumor report has named such a gene and nobody has raised germline testing with you, it is reasonable to ask.
The second idea is that we all carry two copies of every gene. Most hereditary cancer genes are tumor suppressor genes, whose normal job is to repair damage or restrain cell growth. A person with a hereditary syndrome is born with one working copy and one that does not work. One working copy is enough for normal life, which is why carriers are healthy. But every cell in their body is one step closer to trouble than everyone else’s. If the remaining copy is damaged in any single cell over a lifetime, that cell loses the protection entirely.
This explains the pattern these syndromes produce. Cancers appear earlier than usual, because the process has a head start. They appear in more than one organ, because every cell in the body carries the change. And they appear in more than one place in the same organ, or in both of a paired organ, more often than expected.
Certain patterns raise the possibility of a hereditary syndrome and are the reason a doctor may suggest genetic testing:
Gathering an accurate family history is genuinely useful preparation. What matters is who had cancer, how they are related to you, which side of the family they are on, the exact type of cancer, and the age at diagnosis. Obtaining a relative’s pathology report is often the single most valuable thing a family can do, because the specific subtype recorded there frequently determines whether testing criteria are met.
People are usually told their risk as a percentage. Understanding what that number is, and is not, matters more than any other part of this subject.
Risk is always a range, not a single figure. Published estimates for the same syndrome often differ substantially, and there is a specific reason. Early studies of these conditions looked at families identified precisely because so many members had cancer. Those families were selected for having a lot of cancer, so the risks calculated from them were higher than the risk faced by an average carrier. As testing became cheaper and was offered more widely, carriers began to be found in families with unremarkable histories, and the estimates fell, sometimes by half or more.
Your own family history shifts the number. For most syndromes, a carrier with several close relatives affected at young ages faces a considerably higher risk than a carrier discovered incidentally in a family with little cancer. The same gene change can carry meaningfully different implications in two different families.
Risk is not the same for every gene, even within one syndrome. Lynch syndrome is caused by changes in any of five genes, and the risks differ so much between them that they are now managed as related but distinct conditions.
A high lifetime risk is not a certainty. This is the point most often lost. A 70% lifetime risk means that about three in ten carriers will never develop that cancer. The reverse is also true, and both halves deserve stating: the risk is high enough to justify serious preventive measures, and low enough that many carriers never develop the disease. These figures describe groups of people, not individuals, and a genetics service can give an estimate that reflects your genes, your sex, and your own family.
Finally, a risk figure describes what happens without screening or preventive treatment. It is a description of the natural course of the condition, not a forecast of your future, and the whole point of knowing is to change it.
Testing for a hereditary syndrome is done on a blood sample or, less often, a saliva sample. It examines the DNA a person was born with rather than the DNA of a tumor, so it can be done whether or not a person has ever had cancer.
The laboratory uses next-generation sequencing to read the genes letter by letter, together with a separate method that detects large deletions and duplications, where whole sections of a gene are missing or repeated. Both are needed, because a meaningful share of changes in some genes are large rearrangements that sequencing alone will not find. Someone tested many years ago may reasonably ask whether their test included this step and whether retesting is worthwhile.
Testing is almost always done as a panel covering many genes at once rather than one gene at a time. This finds more, but it also means a result may name a gene nobody was expecting, including genes whose implications are less well understood. This is one reason testing is arranged alongside genetic counseling rather than ordered as a standalone laboratory test.
Laboratories classify each change they find according to how confident they are that it affects the gene:
A positive result confirms the syndrome. It means an increased lifetime risk of specific cancers, a plan for screening and possibly for reducing risk, and implications for blood relatives.
A negative result means two quite different things depending on the situation, and confusing them is consequential:
This second point is misunderstood often enough to be worth stating directly: a negative result in a family with a striking cancer history does not explain the family history away, and it does not mean enhanced screening can stop.
Knowing about a hereditary syndrome is useful because it opens options that are not available to people at average risk. Which of these apply depends entirely on the syndrome.
These are options the care team discusses rather than instructions. Decisions about timing, and particularly about surgery, are personal and are usually revisited more than once over the years.
Most hereditary cancer syndromes are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, which means a single altered copy is enough to cause the condition. Each child, sibling, and parent of a carrier has a 50% chance of carrying the same change. A few syndromes are recessive, requiring a non-working copy from both parents, and the explanation for those families is different.
Three points are worth emphasizing because they are commonly misunderstood:
Testing is usually offered to adult relatives. The right age for children depends entirely on the syndrome: for most, testing is deferred until adulthood because nothing about management changes before then, but for some, screening genuinely begins in childhood and testing is offered early. Genetics services help with this and with the difficult practical work of telling relatives, including providing a letter that can be passed on.
Concern about how a genetic result might be used is common and is one of the main reasons people hesitate to be tested. It deserves a direct answer rather than reassurance.
Legal protections exist, and they differ by country. In Canada, federal legislation prohibits requiring a person to undergo genetic testing or to disclose results as a condition of obtaining goods, services, or a contract, including insurance. In the United States, federal law prohibits health insurers and employers from using genetic information, but those protections do not extend to life, disability, or long-term care insurance. Other countries vary considerably, some through legislation and some through voluntary agreements with insurers.
Because the rules differ and change over time, this is a question worth raising directly with a genetics service before testing rather than afterward. They will know the current position where you live and can explain what is and is not protected. It is also worth knowing that results from clinical genetic testing are part of your medical record and are subject to the same privacy protections as the rest of it, and that direct-to-consumer testing companies operate under different rules than clinical laboratories.